Gastric & Breast Cancer e-journal
DOI: 10.2122/gbc.2010.0130
PERSPECTIVE
|
Comparative-effectiveness research and personalized medicine: Trends and debate
|
Prof. Theodore Liakakos, MD, PhD
|
Affiliation: Theodore Liakakos, MD, Professor of Surgery, 3rd Department of Surgery, University of Athens, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Rimini 1, Chaidari, Athens 12462, Greece.
E-mail: theodlia@otenet.gr |
ABSTRACT
Comparative-effectiveness research (CER) is the current gold standard for improving health care. New products including drugs, medical devices, diagnostics, biomarkers and therapeutics should be proven more effective and safe as compared to standards that are used in a day-to-day clinical practice. International and national Organizations or Agency, such as FDA require rigorous criteria for approval of new diagnostics and therapeutics usually met in large randomized controlled trials. However, such an evaluation does not consider differences in therapy response and adverse effects among patients with same disease who receive the same treatment.
Based on the recent DNA sequencing technology explosion that reveals a widespread genetic variation among patients, a similar explosion over the last few years has been occurred on research for personalized medicine. Aim is to discover those causal mutations characteristic for each patient, which will allow the development of specific individualized therapies. However, there is critique that it is too early for personalized diagnostics and therapeutic approaches and this human genome heterogeneity-based research requires major costs and funding with uncertain effectiveness.
(Citation: Gastric & Breast Cancer 2010; 9(3): 95-101)
|
|
You can have an online full-text access and a PDF of this article: |
- Either purchase this paper for €33 EUR. Please, click here
|
|
- Or through one year subscription PayPal
|
|
Online
ISSN : 1109 - 7647
Print ISSN : 1109 - 7655
We
subscribe to the HONcode principles. Verify
here.
please, read our policy about privacy
and confidentiality of information and transparency
of sponsorship
last
update: 26 April 2010 |
|
|
|